DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORBS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD
ARLINGTON, VA 22204
JBH
Docket No. NR7547-13
25 March 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
24 March 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser
N130C/13U1048 Gated x, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
making this determination, the Board substantially concurred with the
comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of
the panel will be Furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
‘Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure: OCNO Memo 7220 Ser W130C/13U1048 dated ne
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5250 13
NR5250-13 1i March 2014 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4814 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application ‘on 10 March 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser N130C/1300997 dated eres a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4752 13
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser Ni30C/13U1038 dated ea, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2152 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser Ni30C/130U1037 dtated We. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7151 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser N130C/13U1016 — a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7669 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and — applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board © considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser N130C/13U1042 dated a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9045 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice, In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0406 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser 1130C/14U0650 dated 27 May 2014, a COpy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to gGemonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR746 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 duly 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N1i30C/1400651 Gated 27 May 2014, a COpy of which is attached. consequently, when applying for a4 correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6066 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 November 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser Wi30C/14U1348 dated 15 October 2014, a copy of which was sent to you on 18 October 2014; it was returned to sender on 5 November 2014. De Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...